On Hash Tag Indiscretions

THATCher

 

I am certainly not one to revel in the death of another, but I cannot help but smirk at the recent Twitter faux pas of #nowthatchersdead. Statements had to be released to reassure worried fans that the 66-year-old pop diva was indeed still alive after the trending topic remained unclear to many.

Not surprisingly, this isn’t the first time that the humble hash tag has gone awry: one of my favourite Twitter bungles was that of Waitrose whom opted for #WaitroseReasons.

Just last year the supermarket opened themselves up to ridicule as they invited customers to Tweet their own reasons for shopping at the upmarket supermarket. #WaitroseReasons drew in responses such as “I shop at Waitrose because I think food must automatically be better if it costs three times as much”, and “I shop at Waitrose because it makes me feel important and I absolutely detest being surrounded by poor people”.

In 2012, hash tag blunders reached whole new levels as #Aurora began trending globally following fatal shootings at a US screening of Batman’s ‘the Dark Knight Rises’. Fashion retailer @celebboutique fatally misinterpreted this (or played ignorant) and tweeted to their 62,000 followers: “#Aurora is trending, clearly about our Kim K inspired #Aurora dress”.  Naturally, this caused outrage online and the UK based outlet was forced to apologise: “we didn’t check what the trend was about hence the confusion”.

Clarity is important when publishing 140 characters for the whole world to see. #nowthatchersdead is not a trend that I particularly enjoy, however to avoid the confusion I would have simply recommended using camel case – what could be misinterpreted as #NowThatChersDead becomes #NowThatchersDead as was intended.

Tweet me @DanielleDunn_CA if you’ve ever made a Twitter gaffe of your own!

Tweet For Recommended Reads

twitter-icon-with-books-230x299

The Internet is inundated with technology designed to provide a user-friendly, personalised experience for each of us. Ways in which this can be achieved is social media. By fluffing up our profile a bit on Facebook, websites can access our preferences in film, music, television, hobbies etc. and provide a tailor-made Internet experience.

The Twitterverse is also accustomed to outsourcing our data to help other websites cater to our needs and desires. By collecting information on commonly tweeted phrases, hash tags and users, a website can provide a unique service to you.

One such website is BookRx which can recommend books for the user to read according to information collated simply from their user name.

Screen Shot 2013-01-03 at 17.57.13

My agency’s Twitter handle @DanielleDunn_CA returned a whole host of books on e-commerce, business and marketing, as well as books on sport & fitness, social sciences and productivity. There were even a few recommended reads on cakes and baking; heaven knows where they came from 😉

Tell us which books your username attracted. How accurate do you find the service?